Three technology decisions are competing for one partner meeting
A small law firm turns a pile of quotes and aging systems into an ordered technology plan with named owners.
The business situation.
Law-firm partners and practice managers who must decide which technology work comes first
Two partners have a printer lease renewal, a document-management quote and a phone-system proposal on the same conference table, and each vendor only sees its own piece. The practice manager holds the logins and contract dates in a binder and in their head. Every decision feels urgent, so none of them has a clear owner or a date.
An illustrative business situation, not a customer case study.
How we can help.
Bladesystems reviews the systems the firm uses, the contracts behind them and who depends on each one. Decisions are then sorted by business risk and dependency into a written sequence that names an owner for every item and flags purchases that should wait.
- Current-system review
- Priorities and responsibilities
- A sequenced technology plan
What changes in practice.
The next partner meeting has a written order of work, a named owner for each decision and the questions to put to vendors. The firm can review spending against that plan before renewing or buying.
The pile
Three decisions. One meeting. No order.
The sort
Systems sorted by risk and dependency
The sequence
A written order of work with named owners
Sort your technology decisions.
Gather the current vendor quotes, renewal dates and a short list of the systems staff open every day, and bring the one decision that is hardest to defer.
A consulting plan sets direction and sequence; purchasing, installation and ongoing support are scoped separately if you choose them.
305.253.5000